Tags

, , , ,

The inverted pyramid is a metaphor used by journalists and other writers to illustrate the placing of the most important information first within a text. It is the most widely preferred method in writing news stories

The “inverted” or upside-down “pyramid” can be thought of as a simple triangle with one side drawn horizontally at the top and the body pointing down. The widest part at the top represents the most substantial, interesting, and important information the writer means to convey, illustrating that this kind of material should head the article, while the tapering lower portion illustrates that other material should follow in order of diminishing importance. It is sometimes called a “summary news lead” style.[1]

The format is valued because readers can leave the story at any point and understand it, even if they don’t have all the details. It also allows less important information at the end to be more easily removed by editors so the article can fit a fixed size.

Other styles are also used in news writing, including the “anecdotal lead,” which begins the story with an eye-catching tale or anecdote rather than the central facts; and the Q&A, or question-and-answer format. This form of writing is also sometimes referenced when referring to the notion of “Bottom Line Up Front” or BLUF[2].

History

Historians disagree about when the form was created. Many say the invention of the telegraph sparked its development by encouraging reporters to send the most important facts first so that if the transmission was interrupted, the focus of the story would survive.[Studies of 19th-century news stories in American newspapers, however, suggest that the form spread several decades later than the telegraph, possibly because the reform era’s social and educational forces encouraged factual reporting rather than more interpretive narrative styles.[1]

In addition, having less-essential facts at the end simplified the process of shortening a story after it had been set in type.

Chip Scanlan’s essay on the form[3] includes this frequently cited example of telegraphic reporting:

This evening at about 9:30 p.m. at Ford’s Theatre, the President, while sitting in his private box with Mrs. Lincoln, Mrs. Harris and Major Rathburn, was shot by an assassin, who suddenly entered the box and approached behind the President.

The assassin then leaped upon the stage, brandishing a large dagger or knife, and made his escape in the rear of the theatre.

The pistol ball entered the back of the President’s head and penetrated nearly through the head. The wound is mortal.

The President has been insensible ever since it was inflicted, and is now dying.

About the same hour an assassin, whether the same or not, entered Mr. Seward’s apartment and under pretense of having a prescription was shown to the Secretary’s sick chamber. The assassin immediately rushed to the bed and inflicted two or three stabs on the chest and two on the face. It is hoped the wounds may not be mortal. My apprehension is that they will prove fatal.

The nurse alarmed Mr. Frederick Seward, who was in an adjoining room, and he hastened to the door of his father’s room, when he met the assassin, who inflicted upon him one or more dangerous wounds. The recovery of Frederick Seward is doubtful.

It is not probable that the President will live through the night.

General Grant and his wife were advertised to be at the theatre…

New York Herald, April 15, 1865

‘Who,’ ‘when’, ‘where’, ‘what’ and ‘how’ are addressed in the first paragraph. As the article continues, the less important details are presented. An even more pyramid-conscious reporter or editor would move two additional details to the first two sentences: That the shot was to the head, and that it was expected to prove fatal. The transitional sentence about the Grants suggests that less-important facts are being added to the rest of the story.

References

  1. ^ a b Errico, Marcus; et al.. “The evolution of the summary news lead.”. http://www.scripps.ohiou.edu/mediahistory/mhmjour1-1.htm
  2. ^ Being Direct 1: Martin Krieger’s ‘Bottom Line Up Front’, http://sites.google.com/site/writingmatterssite/Home/being-direct-1-bottom-line-up-front
  3. ^ Scanlan, Chip (2003-06-23). “An examination of the inverted pyramid”. Poynter Institute. http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=52&aid=38693. Retrieved 2006-07-04. 

Advertisements